Who's Right?A neutral AI
Each person tells their side of the dispute. The Who's Right AI examines both sides using the same four criteria: the facts reported, the commitments made and kept, the way each person communicates, and any bad-faith arguments spotted.
It then shows how far each person is right, as a percentage, and suggests a compromise to move forward.
Behaviors and arguments, never people
The verdict is about what was done and said in the dispute: a broken promise, a lack of communication, a bad-faith argument. It never judges the worth of the people involved.
Articles and episodes of the Conflicts section
The situations shown in the Conflicts section are fictional and given as examples. The verdict shown is the one delivered by the Who's Right AI.
Articles are written with the help of AI from official sources, then reviewed by the Who's Right team before publication. When an article has been reviewed by the team, its verification date is shown (“Verified on …”). The sources cited in the “What the rules say” box are visible links that anyone can check.
What Who's Right is not
- It is not a judge, and it is not legal or psychological advice.
- The verdict depends on what each person tells.
- Information about rules is general: it does not replace advice from a professional.
- In case of violence or danger, contact the appropriate services.
Report an error to us
Does some information look wrong, or a source out of date? Write to us at support@whos-right.ai with the address of the page. We check it and correct the page if needed.